Transfer decisionHoldImmediate
The creator would avoid making a transfer for Gameweek 10 if his players remain fit, because the current squad already has strong fixtures and transfers should generally be reserved for defenders.
Reasoning: He says he cannot justify a transfer while everyone is fit and expects his next few moves to be defensive upgrades rather than forced attacker changes.
Players/teams: Arsenal (Defensive context)
there's no way I can justify making a transfer as long as everyone's fit... my next few transfers probably will be defenders
Play from 7:15 · 5 seconds before evidence ↗FixturesBenchImmediate
Lewis Hall should be benched for Gameweek 10 among the discussed defensive options.
Reasoning: The creator explicitly selects Hall as the defender to bench and is pessimistic about his Monday-night fixture.
Players/teams: Lewis Hall (Subject)
I would bench Lewis Hall out of those
Play from 10:56 · 5 seconds before evidence ↗Transfer decisionHoldMedium
Gibbs-White is not a must-sell and can be held if the squad has no more urgent problems.
Reasoning: The creator repeatedly rejects the idea that Gibbs-White must be sold and expects him to remain a good longer-term pick because of his minutes and future fixtures.
Players/teams: Morgan Gibbs-White (Subject)
Is Gibbs White a mustell now? No... he's probably okay still... I would not be forcing him out... he's going to end up being a pretty good pick longer term
Play from 4:52 · 5 seconds before evidence ↗Minutes availabilitySellImmediate
Chukwueze should be sold because his minutes are too uncertain and his recent benchings and early substitutions are concerning.
Reasoning: The creator identifies him as a definite sell, citing multiple benchings and half-time substitutions, and says there are better players available.
Players/teams: Rayan Cherki (Subject)
for me, Churkey would definitely be one of them... he's been benched twice... and been subbed off at halftime twice as well
Play from 12:03 · 5 seconds before evidence ↗Minutes availabilityHoldShort
Manzambi should be held if already owned, but managers without him should wait until Gameweek 11 rather than buy him immediately.
Reasoning: The creator likes the upcoming fixtures but is worried by repeated early substitutions and recommends holding existing ownership while delaying a new purchase.
Players/teams: Johan Manzambi (Subject)
if you've got Man Zambi I'd definitely hold him... but if you don't have him, I'd be tempted just to wait until gameweek 11 now
Play from 17:30 · 5 seconds before evidence ↗FixturesStartImmediate
Pascal Groß should be held and started ahead of more speculative options because of his home fixture and penalty-taking role.
Reasoning: Although the creator finds the benching decision difficult, he ultimately says he would play Groß and repeatedly treats penalties and Brighton's fixtures as strong reasons to retain him.
Players/teams: Pascal Groß (Subject), Brighton & Hove Albion (Team context)
I think if it came down to it, I would have to play Gross... can you really bench Gross at home on penalties?... Brighton's fixtures... are just really good
Play from 11:17 · 5 seconds before evidence ↗CaptaincyAvoidImmediate
Jackson should not be used as a differential captain for Gameweek 10.
Reasoning: The creator expresses zero interest in the idea because Jackson is away at Manchester United and is not on penalties, while better captaincy options exist.
Players/teams: Manchester United (Opponent), Nicolas Jackson (Subject)
Zero interest in that next week... Man United away for a player that's not on penalties. Me, not for me.
Play from 13:53 · 5 seconds before evidence ↗Chips wildcardBenchImmediate
A Gameweek 10 bench boost is attractive when the bench includes a playing goalkeeper, Brighton coverage, Evanilson and Bournemouth coverage.
Reasoning: The creator repeatedly argues that this is unlikely to be a better bench early in the season and specifically encourages activating the chip if those players would otherwise remain benched.
Players/teams: Bournemouth (Team context), Brighton & Hove Albion (Team context)
when are you going to get a better bench than that?... I'd be tempted to try and get that bench boost activated
Play from 16:50 · 5 seconds before evidence ↗Squad structureWatchShort
The creator favours a defensive squad structure in the short term, with future transfers mainly used to add defenders and flexibility rather than replace decent attackers.
Reasoning: He says many current midfielders and forwards are almost as good as potential replacements, while defenders offer the clearest upgrade path and may lead to formations with four or five defenders.
Players/teams: Arsenal (Defensive context)
you want to work towards just getting the defcon defenders in... my next few transfers probably will be defenders... play four or five at the back
Play from 6:13 · 5 seconds before evidence ↗Minutes availabilityWatchShort
De Cuyper's minutes should be monitored, but the creator would not buy him solely to bench Mirramovic in Gameweek 10.
Reasoning: He acknowledges the possibility of De Cuyper's minutes falling but says Mirramovic is acceptable for the current week and the transfer is not justified purely for benching purposes.
Players/teams: Luka Vušković (Alternative), Maxim De Cuyper (Alternative)
At what point do his minutes go down?... I think Mirramovic is okay this week. So, I probably wouldn't make a transfer specifically to bench him
Play from 14:20 · 5 seconds before evidence ↗Value marketBuyMedium
Vuskovic is the safer long-term defensive purchase than De Cuyper if choosing purely for long-term security.
Reasoning: The creator says De Cuyper continuing as a left winger is possible but identifies Vuskovic as the safe long-term play.
Players/teams: Luka Vušković (Subject), Maxim De Cuyper (Alternative)
the safer bet is to buy Vuskovic... the safe long-term play is just to buy Vuskovic
Play from 32:22 · 5 seconds before evidence ↗Value marketWatchImmediate
Silva is a short-term price-rise candidate, with the creator expecting his price to rise soon.
Reasoning: He explicitly says Silva is likely to rise in price, potentially within the next day, making him a watchlist or early-transfer target.
Players/teams: António Silva (Subject)
I think he's going to go up in price soon. Maybe tonight or tomorrow.
Play from 51:27 · 5 seconds before evidence ↗Form underlyingAvoidMedium
Defensive-midfield Defcon specialists should generally be avoided as FPL purchases unless they also offer meaningful attacking threat.
Reasoning: The creator argues that Defcon midfielders have not been good picks compared with other options, highlighting uncertain minutes and limited attacking returns.
Players/teams: Arsenal (Comparison context)
there's no defcon midfielders that are good picks in FPL versus what you can get elsewhere... you need some attacking threat as well as the Defcon
Play from 1:06:10 · 5 seconds before evidence ↗CaptaincyCaptainImmediate
Arsenal defenders are credible Gameweek 10 captaincy options against Hull, with Calafiori and Gabriel specifically discussed as possible best captains.
Reasoning: The creator says an Arsenal defender may be the best captain against Hull and argues that Arsenal's defensive strength makes them viable even with a triple-up.
Players/teams: Riccardo Calafiori (Captaincy option), Arsenal (Team context)
Genuinely, Gabrielle Califury might be best captains... against Hull
Play from 26:53 · 5 seconds before evidence ↗