FixturesStartSeasonal
The creator recommends checking that cheap midfielders and defenders rotate well, because complementary fixtures can improve the points gained from fringe players.
Reasoning: He says managers should avoid pairing cheap players whose best fixtures coincide and explicitly advises reviewing rotations before selecting them.
Players/teams: Brighton & Hove Albion (Rotation context), Leeds United (Rotation context)
Making sure that they have their best fixtures when the other one doesn't is really important... don't just pick players without thinking about how they rotate, especially if they're cheaper players.
Play from 1:11 · 5 seconds before evidence ↗FixturesBuyShort
The creator prefers a Leeds and Brighton pairing for two rotating cheap defenders, with Joe Rodon as the Leeds option and a Brighton 4.5 defender such as Kadioglu or Vushkovic as the partner.
Reasoning: He repeatedly describes Leeds and Brighton as his preferred defensive rotation and directly names the suggested pairings.
Players/teams: Joe Rodon (Subject), Vushkovic (Alternative), Brighton & Hove Albion (Team context), Leeds United (Team context), Ferdi Kadioglu (Alternative)
I really like Leeds and Brighton... If you want two cheap defenders, let's go for Rodon and Decoiper or Kogloo.
Play from 2:46 · 5 seconds before evidence ↗FixturesBuyShort
The creator's preferred three-team rotation for starting two cheap defenders each week is Leeds, Manchester United and Brighton.
Reasoning: He explicitly calls this his favourite three-team rotation and says it provides at least two playable defenders every week.
Players/teams: Manchester United (Rotation team), Brighton & Hove Albion (Rotation team), Leeds United (Rotation team)
My favorite... is Leeds, Man United, Brighton... There is not a single week where you don't have at least two really playable players.
Play from 4:56 · 5 seconds before evidence ↗Value marketWatchImmediate
The creator considers Jan Paul van Hecke an underrated 5.0 defender with strong defensive-contribution potential and is tempted to start him.
Reasoning: He singles out Van Hecke as the defender people are overlooking and places him third among his underpriced defensive-contribution picks.
Players/teams: Brighton & Hove Albion (Team context), Antonin Kinsky (Squad context), Van Heck (Subject)
The one that I think does stand out... incredibly underrated is Van Hecker. I think he will mop up the defensive contributions this season. I am so tempted to start the season with him.
Play from 8:58 · 5 seconds before evidence ↗Value marketBuyImmediate
The creator ranks Mamadou Sangari as his top underpriced defensive-contribution midfielder and expects an immediate breakout season at Brentford.
Reasoning: He highlights Sangari's defensive-contribution record, attacking threat and explicitly names him first among his top three underpriced picks.
Players/teams: Mamadou Sangari (Subject), Brentford (Team context)
Mamadou Sangari... a bit of attacking threat... I think he will have a breakout season immediately with Brentford... Mamadou Sangari first.
Play from 6:34 · 5 seconds before evidence ↗Transfer decisionBuyImmediate
The creator ranks Kevin Schade as the best midfielder priced at 6.0 or below because of his elite underlying data, but only if he stays and retains acceptable minutes.
Reasoning: He places Schade first, cites his non-penalty expected-goal data and positive Brentford fixtures, while clearly warning about early substitutions and transfer uncertainty.
Players/teams: Jaden Anthony (Minutes competition), Kevin Schade (Subject), Brentford (Team context)
In first I've actually gone for Kevin Sharda... The issue... is that his minutes aren't perfect. He does often get early subs... So I think if he stays... and his minutes remain decent... he's got comfortably the best data.
Play from 18:45 · 5 seconds before evidence ↗Minutes availabilityWatchImmediate
The creator likes Jack Hinshelwood as a high-upside cheap midfielder, but would avoid the punt if heavy transfer rumours persist before the Gameweek 1 deadline.
Reasoning: He says Hinshelwood is in his draft and highlights his late-season attacking data, while explicitly warning that transfer rumours could make him too risky.
Players/teams: Manchester United (Potential destination), Jack Hinshelwood (Subject)
I have got Hinchwood in my latest draft... There have been some rumors... So if there are heavy transfer rumors going into the gameweek one deadline, I might not risk it.
Play from 21:25 · 5 seconds before evidence ↗Squad structureNeutralSeasonal
The creator prefers spreading cheap-midfielder picks across different profiles rather than selecting only defensive-contribution players: one Defcon player, one penalty taker and one exciting attacker.
Reasoning: He explicitly describes this as the approach he is leaning towards when building a cheap-midfielder group.
Players/teams: Mamadou Sangari (Defcon profile), Pascal Groß (Penalty profile), Jack Hinshelwood (Upside profile)
If you want to have a mixture, pick like one Defcon guy, one penalty taker, one exciting player. That's kind of the way that I'm leaning.
Play from 20:14 · 5 seconds before evidence ↗Form underlyingAvoidImmediate
The creator does not want to start the season with Pascal Groß or Enzo Le Fée unless their penalties or set pieces compensate for their limited underlying threat.
Reasoning: He says both players rely heavily on penalties or set pieces and describes their current profiles as uninspiring.
Players/teams: Pascal Groß (Subject), Enzo Le Fée (Subject)
For me are three players that you need penalties... you really then need assists from set pieces and penalty goals and it feels a little bit uninspiring at the moment for me.
Play from 22:02 · 5 seconds before evidence ↗Minutes availabilityAvoidImmediate
The creator is concerned about Noah Okafor's minutes and prefers Anton Stach in his cheap-midfielder ranking instead.
Reasoning: He says Okafor struggles to play 90 minutes consistently, with alternative wingers increasing the rotation risk, and explains that this is why Stach replaces him on the list.
Players/teams: Anton Stach (Alternative), Noah Okafor (Subject), Harry Wilson (Minutes competition), Paxten Aaronson (Minutes competition)
I wanted to put Okafur in here, but there are marginal doubts over his minutes... I do just slightly worry about Okafor's minutes. So Stach's in there instead.
Play from 23:07 · 5 seconds before evidence ↗Transfer decisionAvoidImmediate
The creator advises against taking an Aston Villa cheap-midfielder risk such as Emiliano Buendía at the start of the season.
Reasoning: He says Villa assets may become good value later but sees no reason to accept the risk immediately.
Players/teams: Aston Villa (Team context), Emiliano Buendía Stati (Subject)
I think the Aston Villa assets could be good value at points but not to start the season. I don't see any reason why you need to take a risk on Buendia.
Play from 23:58 · 5 seconds before evidence ↗Role team contextHoldSeasonal
The creator views Martin Ødegaard as more likely to deliver assists than goals this season and expects fewer than 10 goals.
Reasoning: He repeatedly says Ødegaard should operate as a number 10 but expects him to provide more than score and to score very few goals.
Players/teams: Arsenal (Team context), Martin Ødegaard (Subject)
I do think Erdigard will play more so this season as a 10... I expect him to provide more than score... I think he'll score very few goals, maybe less than 10 this season.
Play from 25:32 · 5 seconds before evidence ↗Transfer decisionBuyImmediate
The creator prefers Christos Tzolis over Martin Ødegaard as an Arsenal attacking asset because he believes Tzolis has more secure minutes and stronger upside, while accepting that a double-up can be reassessed after two matches.
Reasoning: He says Tzolis is the preferred player, considers his minutes more secure, and explicitly permits keeping both only if both perform and avoid rotation.
Players/teams: Arsenal (Team context), Christos Tzolis (Subject), Martin Ødegaard (Alternative)
I actually think his minutes are more secure... I just think right now Zis is more of an FPL asset... I actually don't mind the double up... after those two games, if one of them looks really disappointing or gets rotated, you can always sell them. So, yeah, I prefer Zis.
Play from 28:45 · 5 seconds before evidence ↗CaptaincyBuyImmediate
The creator wants to enter Gameweek 1 with at least two Arsenal players and would ideally own three, based on Arsenal's projections and their home fixture.
Reasoning: He identifies Arsenal as the leading team for projected goals and clean-sheet probability and says his current draft contains two Arsenal players.
Players/teams: Arsenal (Team context)
Arsenal... are top for projected goals and top for clean sheet percentage... I am finding it very difficult not to go into gameweek one with at least two Arsenal and I'd love three, but right now in my current draft, I have two.
Play from 30:06 · 5 seconds before evidence ↗FixturesBuyImmediate
The creator considers Manchester City and Manchester United strong Gameweek 1 attacking options alongside Arsenal, but sees City's clean-sheet outlook as relatively weak.
Reasoning: He ranks both teams highly for projected goals, while contrasting Manchester City's 33% clean-sheet projection with Manchester United's 46%.
Players/teams: Manchester City (Team context), Manchester United (Team context), Arsenal (Comparator)
Man City and Man United assets look really good for game one... City have 2.33 projected goals and 33% chance of a clean sheet... Man United 2.15 projected goals and 46% chance.
Play from 30:32 · 5 seconds before evidence ↗